Bulimia Nervosa Treatment Plan: Goals, Objectives, & Example for Mental Health Professionals

Treatment plans are one of the most important clinical documents completed in behavioral health. They provide a structured roadmap that connects a client’s diagnosis, symptoms, strengths, and treatment needs to measurable goals, evidence-based interventions, and ongoing progress monitoring. Because bulimia nervosa carries meaningful medical risk connected to compensatory behaviors, a well-written treatment plan helps ensure care remains structured, medically coordinated, and clinically sound.

Creating an effective bulimia nervosa treatment plan involves much more than listing a few goals. It requires a comprehensive understanding of the client’s specific binge-purge pattern, its function, medical status, and the evidence-based approaches most likely to interrupt the cycle and address the shape and weight concerns that typically drive it. A strong treatment plan also demonstrates medical necessity, facilitates communication between providers, and creates objective benchmarks that make it easier to evaluate progress over time.

In this guide, we’ll walk through how to create an evidence-based bulimia treatment plan, discuss what information should be included, provide practical examples of treatment goals and objectives, and review common documentation considerations for mental health professionals. Whether you’re a student, intern, or experienced clinician, these examples can serve as a starting point for developing individualized treatment plans that reflect each client’s unique presentation.

Key Takeaways

• Bulimia treatment plans should be individualized. Effective plans connect the client’s specific binge-purge pattern, its function, medical status, and functional impairment to measurable goals rather than relying on generic documentation.
• Bulimia nervosa is distinguished from binge eating disorder by the presence of recurrent compensatory behaviors (self-induced vomiting, laxative or diuretic misuse, fasting, or excessive exercise) intended to prevent weight gain; DSM-5 removed the earlier purging/nonpurging subtype distinction.
• Medical coordination is essential given the physical risks associated with purging behaviors, including electrolyte imbalances and cardiac risk; treatment plans should document medical monitoring alongside psychotherapy.
• The APA recommends eating-disorder-focused CBT for adults with bulimia, together with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor such as fluoxetine 60 mg/day, prescribed either initially or if there is minimal response to psychotherapy alone by about 6 weeks (Crone et al., 2023). CBT-E is one well-established model within the broader eating-disorder-focused CBT approach referenced in guidelines.
• Treatment goals should follow SMART principles and address the binge-purge cycle and shape/weight overvaluation directly, rather than treating weight as the primary clinical target.

View our Counseling Treatment Plan Template, which corresponds with this guide.

Why Treatment Planning Matters for Bulimia Nervosa

Clients with bulimia experience recurrent episodes of binge eating followed by compensatory behaviors intended to prevent weight gain, most often within the context of significant preoccupation with shape and weight. While clients often share common features—including a cyclical restriction-binge-purge pattern and substantial shame—every client’s specific pattern, compensatory methods, and medical status are different. Effective treatment planning helps clinicians organize assessment findings into a personalized course of treatment that reflects the client’s specific presentation and medical needs rather than a generic eating-disorder template.

A comprehensive treatment plan also serves several important clinical and administrative purposes. It supports continuity of care, promotes collaboration between providers (particularly medical providers, given the physical risks associated with purging), documents medical necessity for third-party payers, and creates measurable outcomes that can be reviewed throughout treatment. Rather than functioning as a static document completed during intake, treatment plans should be reviewed and updated regularly as the client’s binge-purge pattern and medical status change.

Whenever possible, treatment planning should be a collaborative process. Involving clients in identifying their specific triggers and selecting meaningful goals often increases engagement, particularly given the significant shame frequently associated with this presentation. Instead of focusing solely on binge or purge frequency, treatment plans should also address the shape and weight overvaluation that typically drives the underlying cycle.

Complete a Thorough Clinical Assessment Before Writing the Treatment Plan

A treatment plan should never be developed in isolation. Before identifying goals or selecting interventions, clinicians should complete a comprehensive assessment to better understand the client’s binge-purge pattern, medical status, and diagnostic picture. Information gathered during the intake assessment provides the clinical foundation for every section of the treatment plan.

For clients presenting with possible bulimia, this assessment includes a detailed clinical interview addressing binge frequency and the loss-of-control experience; the specific type and frequency of compensatory behaviors (self-induced vomiting, laxative or diuretic misuse, fasting, or excessive exercise); dietary restriction; the degree of shape and weight overvaluation and body-image disturbance; duration and trajectory of the eating disorder; current nutritional pattern; co-occurring conditions such as depression, anxiety, or substance use; suicide and self-harm risk; prior eating-disorder treatment and response; the client’s motivation and any ambivalence about treatment; functional impairment; and relevant cultural, developmental, and contextual factors (Crone et al., 2023). Medical evaluation, including assessment for electrolyte abnormalities and cardiac risk, is a critical component of initial assessment given the physical dangers associated with purging behaviors, and should inform the appropriate level of care.

If you are looking for additional guidance on collecting assessment information before creating a treatment plan, our guides to the Counseling Intake Assessment and Biopsychosocial Assessment provide more detailed recommendations for conducting comprehensive evaluations.

Develop a Clinical Formulation Before Creating Treatment Goals

One of the most valuable steps in treatment planning is developing a clinical formulation before writing goals and objectives. While a diagnosis identifies what condition a client meets criteria for, a clinical formulation explains why the binge-purge cycle is occurring, what factors are maintaining it, and why the selected interventions are appropriate. A thoughtful formulation helps ensure that treatment remains individualized rather than relying on generic goals.

For clients with bulimia, formulation should consider the specific compensatory method(s) used and associated medical risk, the role of shape and weight overvaluation in driving dietary restriction between binges, and the function binge eating serves (commonly relief from restriction-driven physiological and psychological pressure, or emotion regulation). CBT-E’s transdiagnostic model conceptualizes the binge-purge cycle as maintained by an interacting pattern of shape/weight overvaluation, strict dietary rules, binge episodes that break those rules, and compensatory behaviors intended to undo the binge, which in turn reinforces the original restrictive rules (Fairburn, 2008).

A strong clinical formulation naturally guides treatment planning. For example, if a client’s cycle is driven primarily by rigid dietary restriction between binges, treatment should directly target the elimination of restriction alongside compensatory behaviors, since continued restriction will likely maintain binge urges. If purging appears to serve an additional emotion-regulation function beyond compensating for a binge, treatment should also address alternative emotion regulation strategies. The treatment plan should clearly demonstrate how the selected interventions address the mechanisms maintaining the client’s specific cycle.

Many treatment plans remain superficial because they list symptoms and interventions without explaining the clinical reasoning connecting the two. A strong formulation demonstrates why specific goals were prioritized, why certain interventions were selected, and how the client’s diagnosis, history, strengths, and barriers influence the treatment approach.

Establish Medical Necessity Through Functional Impairment

Treatment plans should document more than the presence of binge-purge episodes. They should clearly explain how this pattern interferes with the client’s daily functioning and physical health. Documenting clinically significant functional impairment and medical risk can help support medical necessity determinations, but requirements vary by payer, jurisdiction, service type, and clinical setting, and documenting impairment alone does not automatically establish or guarantee medical necessity for every payer.

Rather than simply documenting that a client “binges and purges,” describe the observable consequences. Examples may include documented electrolyte abnormalities connected to purging, social withdrawal to conceal the behavior, or significant distress and preoccupation with shape and weight interfering with daily functioning. These examples create a stronger clinical picture than documenting the presence of the behaviors alone.

Whenever possible, establish a measurable baseline before treatment begins. Documented frequency of binge and compensatory episodes, combined with a standardized eating disorder measure and relevant medical findings, can assist clinicians in assessing severity and monitoring changes over time when used as part of a broader clinical evaluation.

Creating SMART Bulimia Treatment Goals

Effective treatment goals should be individualized, collaborative, and measurable. One of the most common documentation mistakes is writing goals that are too broad to evaluate objectively, or goals that center weight rather than the eating disorder behaviors themselves. Statements such as “stop bingeing and purging” or “improve eating habits” provide little guidance for future treatment sessions and make it difficult to determine whether meaningful progress has occurred.

Instead, treatment goals should follow SMART principles whenever clinically appropriate. Goals should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound, and should be built around reducing binge and compensatory behavior frequency and addressing shape/weight overvaluation, rather than weight change.

Breaking larger goals into smaller objectives also allows clinicians to recognize incremental progress throughout treatment. These measurable objectives become valuable reference points during treatment plan reviews and progress note documentation.

Bulimia Treatment Goal Examples

The following bulimia treatment goal examples are designed to help mental health professionals develop individualized treatment plans based on each client’s diagnosis, binge-purge pattern, functional impairment, strengths, and treatment needs. Effective treatment goals should be collaborative, measurable, and connected to specific objectives and interventions that support meaningful clinical progress.

Goal 1: Establish Regular Eating and Reduce the Binge-Purge Cycle

Long-Term Goal: Client will establish a regular pattern of eating and demonstrate reduced frequency of binge eating and compensatory behaviors.

Possible Objectives:

• Attend scheduled therapy sessions consistently.
• Complete a daily food and behavior log tracking meals, binge episodes, and compensatory behaviors.
• Establish and maintain a pattern of 3 meals and 2 planned snacks daily, at least 5 days weekly.
• Reduce binge and compensatory behavior frequency from baseline, tracked weekly.

Possible Interventions:

• Psychoeducation regarding bulimia and the restriction-binge-purge cycle.
• Self-monitoring of eating patterns, binges, and compensatory behaviors.
• Structured meal planning targeting regular eating.
• Coordination with a medical provider for ongoing monitoring.

Goal 2: Address Shape and Weight Overvaluation

Long-Term Goal: Client will demonstrate reduced overvaluation of shape and weight and its influence on self-evaluation and eating behavior.

Possible Objectives:

• Identify and describe the specific role shape or weight concerns play in driving restriction and the binge-purge cycle.
• Complete a thought record challenging at least one shape- or weight-related belief weekly.
• Identify at least two sources of self-worth independent of shape or weight.
• Report a reduction in shape/weight-related distress, tracked via standardized measure.

Possible Interventions:

• Cognitive restructuring targeting shape and weight overvaluation (Fairburn, 2008).
• Values clarification exploring sources of self-worth beyond appearance.
• Body-image-focused interventions as clinically indicated.
• Ongoing standardized symptom monitoring.

Goal 3: Support Coordinated Medical Safety and Build Alternative Coping Skills

Long-Term Goal: Client will participate in coordinated treatment addressing medical safety while increasing use of adaptive strategies to manage binge and compensatory urges.

Possible Objectives:

• Attend scheduled medical monitoring appointments as recommended.
• Identify and name the specific emotion or trigger present before a binge or purge urge, tracked via log.
• Practice an identified alternative coping strategy during at least 3 documented urge episodes weekly.
• Report increased confidence in managing triggers without engaging in binge or compensatory behaviors.

Possible Interventions:

• Coordination with medical provider regarding ongoing monitoring and lab work.
• Emotion regulation and distress tolerance skills training.
• Interpersonal psychotherapy targeting interpersonal triggers, as an alternative or adjunct to CBT-E.
• Relapse-prevention planning and termination processing.

Remember that these examples are intended as starting points rather than standardized treatment plans. Effective treatment planning requires ongoing collaboration with the client and should reflect their diagnosis, binge-purge pattern, medical status, strengths, cultural considerations, and treatment preferences. Objectives, interventions, and review dates should be modified as the client makes progress or new treatment priorities emerge.

What to Include in a Bulimia Treatment Plan

A comprehensive bulimia treatment plan should do more than identify the binge-purge cycle and list interventions. Effective treatment planning creates a clinical roadmap that connects the client’s diagnosis, presenting concerns, functional impairment, strengths, treatment goals, measurable objectives, and selected interventions.

While treatment plan requirements vary depending on clinical setting, payer expectations, state regulations, and organizational policies, many evidence-informed treatment plans include several core elements that support clinical decision-making, continuity of care, and ongoing measurement of treatment progress.

A comprehensive bulimia treatment plan template typically includes the following clinical documentation sections:

The following sections provide a detailed overview of each component and explain how clinicians can use these elements to create treatment plans that are clinically meaningful, individualized, and responsive to client needs.

1. Client and Plan Information

The first section establishes essential identifying and administrative information while creating a clear record of the treatment episode. Clinicians typically document client information, treatment plan dates, review dates, plan type, clinician information, practice details, session format, session frequency, and the anticipated duration of treatment.

Documenting this information helps establish when treatment began, who is responsible for care, how frequently services are provided, and when the plan should be reviewed. A treatment plan should be considered a living clinical document that changes as the client’s binge-purge pattern, medical status, and treatment needs evolve over time.

2. Coordinating Providers and Services

Given the medical risks associated with purging behaviors, medical coordination is a particularly important component of bulimia treatment planning. This section documents medical providers, dietitians, and other agencies involved in the client’s care, relevant releases of information (ROIs), and plans for coordination when clinically appropriate.

Effective care coordination should include regular communication with the client’s medical provider regarding lab findings, cardiac status, and any indicators that a higher level of care may be needed given medical instability.

3. Diagnostic Summary

The diagnostic summary documents the client’s current diagnosis, applicable ICD-10-CM code, diagnostic considerations, and clinical evidence supporting the diagnosis, consistent with DSM-5-TR criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 2022). Bulimia nervosa requires recurrent episodes of binge eating (eating an objectively large amount of food within a discrete period, accompanied by a sense of loss of control), recurrent inappropriate compensatory behaviors to prevent weight gain (self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or other medications, fasting, or excessive exercise), both occurring on average at least once weekly for 3 months, with self-evaluation unduly influenced by shape and weight, and the disturbance not occurring exclusively during episodes of anorexia nervosa.

A strong diagnostic summary should specify the compensatory method(s) used, since this affects both medical risk assessment and treatment planning. Notably, DSM-5 removed the earlier distinction between purging and nonpurging subtypes of bulimia; current documentation should describe the specific behaviors present rather than assigning an outdated subtype label. Body weight alone should not be used to determine severity, medical risk, or whether a client warrants eating-disorder treatment; bulimia occurs across body sizes, and clinicians should avoid the assumption that it presents primarily at a particular weight.

4. Clinical Formulation and Treatment Rationale

Clinical formulation is one of the most important components of a comprehensive treatment plan because it explains the clinician’s understanding of why the binge-purge cycle is occurring and why specific treatment approaches were selected. Rather than documenting isolated symptoms, clinicians should synthesize the specific compensatory methods used, the role of shape/weight overvaluation and dietary restraint, and relevant co-occurring conditions.

This section should also identify the client’s existing strengths and resources—insight, motivation for treatment, and periods of more regular eating—alongside realistic barriers that may interfere with treatment participation or progress, such as significant shame, medical instability requiring a higher level of care, or ambivalence about giving up compensatory behaviors. A strong formulation demonstrates why specific goals were prioritized and how the client’s diagnosis, history, strengths, and barriers influence the treatment approach.

5. Medication and Concurrent Treatment

When clients receive psychiatric medication, treatment plans should document medication names, dosages, prescribing providers, treatment response, adherence concerns, and recent changes. The APA recommends that adults with bulimia be treated with eating-disorder-focused CBT together with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor such as fluoxetine 60 mg/day, prescribed either at the start of treatment or if there is minimal or no response to psychotherapy alone by about 6 weeks (Crone et al., 2023); this is a decision for the prescribing provider, individualized to the client, rather than a mandatory addition for every client.

This section should also document medical coordination, since electrolyte abnormalities, cardiac risk, and other physical complications connected to purging require ongoing coordination with a medical provider. As clinically indicated, medical assessment and coordination may include vital signs (including orthostatic measurements), electrolyte and metabolic assessment, renal function, an ECG when severe purging or other cardiac/QTc risk factors are present, and assessment of dehydration and other medical complications (Crone et al., 2023). Medical evaluation and management should be performed by appropriately qualified medical professionals; mental health clinicians should not independently manage electrolyte abnormalities, cardiac complications, or dehydration, and dietetic or nutritional care should involve appropriately qualified professionals when indicated. Documenting concurrent services provides a more complete picture of the client’s treatment landscape and supports coordinated clinical decision-making.

6. Presenting Problems and Functional Impact

The presenting problems section describes the client’s primary concerns and explains how the binge-purge cycle interferes with daily functioning and physical health. Effective documentation goes beyond stating that a client “binges and purges” by describing how the pattern interferes with important areas of life.

Clinicians may document impairment related to relationships, work, medical health, and emotional wellbeing. Whenever possible, documentation should include observable examples of impairment. For example, noting documented electrolyte abnormalities, or social withdrawal connected to concealing the behavior, provides stronger clinical evidence than documenting the presence of the cycle alone.

7. Treatment Goals and Objectives

Treatment goals identify the primary clinical outcomes the client and clinician are working toward throughout treatment. Effective bulimia treatment goals should be individualized, clinically meaningful, and connected to the client’s specific binge-purge pattern and maintaining factors.

Each goal should include its own baseline—frequency of binge and compensatory episodes at intake, along with current eating pattern, medical status, and functioning—since establishing this reference allows clinicians to evaluate whether interventions are producing meaningful improvement over time. Short-term objectives then break the larger goal into measurable steps, describing observable changes in eating pattern, binge-purge frequency, or associated distress. Each goal should also document the specific interventions being used to pursue it and the clinical rationale connecting those interventions to the client’s diagnosis, formulation, and presentation, along with how progress toward that goal will be tracked over time.

8. Treatment Modality and Interventions

This section documents the primary treatment modality being used and explains how it supports the client’s treatment goals. The APA recommends that adults with bulimia be treated with eating-disorder-focused CBT together with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor such as fluoxetine 60 mg/day, prescribed either initially or if there is minimal or no response to psychotherapy alone by about 6 weeks of treatment (Crone et al., 2023). Guidelines generally use the broader term “eating-disorder-focused CBT” or “CBT-ED”; CBT-E is one well-established, transdiagnostic model within that category, developed by Fairburn, directly targeting the restriction-binge-purge cycle and shape/weight overvaluation (Fairburn, 2008). Interpersonal psychotherapy is a well-supported alternative, particularly when interpersonal triggers are prominent. NICE, a separate guideline body, describes a stepped-care approach in which bulimia-focused guided self-help is offered as an initial option for adults, with individual eating-disorder-focused CBT considered when guided self-help is unacceptable, contraindicated, or ineffective — an example of how guidelines can differ in sequencing even when they agree on the underlying evidence-based interventions.

This section should also document between-session assignments designed to extend therapeutic work beyond scheduled appointments, such as food and behavior log completion, structured meal planning, or thought records targeting shape/weight beliefs.

9. Risk Assessment and Safety Planning Summary

Although a treatment plan does not replace a comprehensive risk assessment or standalone safety plan, documenting relevant safety considerations is an important component of comprehensive clinical documentation, particularly given elevated rates of suicidal ideation associated with bulimia and the direct physical risks of purging behaviors.

This section may include current and historical suicidal ideation, self-harm concerns, medical risk factors (electrolyte status, cardiac symptoms), factors suggesting a need for a higher level of care, protective factors, overall risk level, and whether a safety plan has been completed when clinically indicated. Consultation with an eating-disorder specialty service and/or a higher level of care should be considered when there is significant or worsening medical instability, severe electrolyte abnormalities, severe dehydration, concerning cardiac findings, inability to interrupt dangerous compensatory behaviors at the current level of care, rapidly worsening symptoms, significant suicide or self-harm risk, or inability to maintain adequate nutrition or safely participate in outpatient treatment. Level-of-care decisions shouldn’t rely on weight or BMI alone. Risk should be individualized and reassessed whenever clinically appropriate, including following any indication of medical instability.

10. Family, Support, and Collateral Involvement

Treatment planning differs by developmental stage. Adults typically receive individual treatment with voluntary involvement of significant others as clinically appropriate; children and adolescents more often warrant family-based approaches, since the APA notes family-based treatment as an option for adolescents and emerging adults with an involved caregiver, and NICE specifically recommends family therapy for children and young people with bulimia, with individual eating-disorder-focused CBT as an alternative when family therapy is unsuitable or ineffective (Crone et al., 2023). Confidentiality, consent or assent, caregiver involvement, developmental needs, and medical monitoring should be addressed according to the client’s age and treatment setting.

Clinicians should also consider culturally shaped beliefs about food, body size, and appearance; access to culturally appropriate foods; family or community attitudes; socioeconomic barriers to regular meals or treatment; stigma and shame; religious or cultural fasting practices when relevant; gender identity and body-image considerations; and barriers to specialty eating-disorder care, since these factors can meaningfully shape both presentation and engagement with treatment.

Treatment plans may document family involvement, collateral contacts, cultural considerations, and other resources involved in treatment. All collateral involvement should be guided by informed consent, confidentiality requirements, and clinical appropriateness.

11. Transition and Discharge Planning

Transition planning helps clinicians and clients identify what successful treatment progress may look like and establish criteria for moving toward discharge or a lower level of care. Discharge criteria may include sustained reduction in binge and compensatory behavior frequency, demonstrated regular eating pattern, reduced shape/weight overvaluation, and confirmed medical stability, rather than a specific weight outcome.

Aftercare planning may include referrals to additional providers, continued medical monitoring, or follow-up care based on the client’s ongoing needs.

12. Plan Review and Signatures

The final section documents treatment plan review, client participation, signatures, and required approvals. Including client participation reinforces that treatment planning is a collaborative process developed between the client and clinician.

Documenting signatures, review dates, updates, and progress summaries provides a clear record that the treatment plan has been discussed, evaluated, and modified as clinically appropriate throughout treatment.

Bulimia Treatment Plan Example

The following example demonstrates how the clinical sections of a bulimia treatment plan connect together for a client presenting with a binge-purge cycle. This example is a fictional, educational illustration rather than a universal treatment protocol, and should be adapted based on the individual client’s presentation, diagnosis, treatment preferences, clinical judgment, practice setting, and applicable documentation requirements. This guide provides documentation examples for mental health professionals and is not a substitute for comprehensive eating-disorder assessment, medical evaluation, clinical supervision, or individualized treatment planning.

Bulimia Treatment Plan Template

The images below provide a preview of TherapyByPro’s Counseling Treatment Plan template, designed for mental health professionals who need a structured framework for documenting bulimia treatment goals, measurable objectives, clinical formulation, interventions, risk considerations, and treatment progress.

The template follows a comprehensive clinical structure that can be adapted for clients presenting with bulimia across a range of compensatory behaviors, medical statuses, and treatment settings. It includes sections for client and plan information, care coordination, diagnostic summary, clinical formulation, medication and concurrent treatment, presenting problems and functional impairment, treatment goals, objectives, interventions, treatment modality, risk assessment, family and support involvement, discharge planning, and plan review documentation.

Organized across 15 dedicated pages, the editable Word document and fillable PDF allow clinicians to customize documentation based on their practice setting, clinical approach, and documentation requirements while maintaining a consistent treatment planning workflow.

Clinicians seeking a complete treatment planning solution can access TherapyByPro’s Counseling Treatment Plan template. For clinicians who need a streamlined tool focused specifically on documenting treatment goals, objectives, and interventions, the Treatment Plan Goals template provides a simplified format for tracking progress across multiple treatment goals.

Common Documentation Mistakes When Writing a Treatment Plan for Bulimia

Even experienced clinicians can develop documentation habits that reduce the clinical usefulness of a bulimia treatment plan. A strong treatment plan should do more than identify that a client “binges and purges”—it should explain the specific pattern, maintaining factors, medical status, functional impairment, treatment goals, selected interventions, and measurable indicators of progress.

The following examples highlight common bulimia treatment planning mistakes, why they create documentation challenges, and how clinicians can strengthen their documentation approach.

Clinical Note: One of the most common documentation challenges in bulimia treatment planning is failing to reflect the necessary medical coordination given the physical risks of purging. A strong bulimia treatment plan connects the client’s specific binge-purge pattern, medical status, functional impairment, treatment goals, interventions, and measurable outcomes into a cohesive, medically informed clinical roadmap.

Conclusion: Creating Effective Bulimia Nervosa Treatment Plans That Support Meaningful Clinical Progress

An effective bulimia nervosa treatment plan is more than a documentation requirement. It connects the client’s specific binge-purge pattern, medical status, and maintaining factors with evidence-based interventions designed to interrupt the cycle safely and address the underlying shape and weight overvaluation.

The APA recommends eating-disorder-focused CBT together with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor such as fluoxetine for adults with bulimia, and close medical coordination remains essential given the physical risks of purging (Crone et al., 2023; Fairburn, 2008). Treatment plans are living documents and should be reviewed and updated as the client’s binge-purge pattern, medical status, and underlying beliefs evolve over the course of treatment.

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed., text revision; DSM-5-TR). American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Resource
• Crone, C., Fochtmann, L. J., Attia, E., Boland, R., Escobar, J., Fornari, V., Golden, N., Guarda, A., Jackson-Triche, M., Manzo, L., Mascolo, M., Pierce, K., Riddle, M., Seritan, A., Uniacke, B., Zucker, N., Yager, J., Craig, T. J., Hong, S. H., & Medicus, J. (2023). The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 180(2), 167–171. Resource
• Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. Guilford Press.