Socratic questioning is a foundational Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) intervention that helps clients examine automatic thoughts, beliefs, assumptions, and interpretations that influence their emotions and behaviors. Rather than providing clients with answers or telling them that their thoughts are inaccurate, therapists use carefully guided questions to support self-reflection, evaluate evidence, and help clients develop more balanced perspectives.
The approach is based on the CBT principle of collaborative empiricism, in which therapists and clients work together to explore thoughts and beliefs through curiosity, evidence, and reflection rather than therapist-directed conclusions (Beck, 2021). Through this process, clients can increase awareness of cognitive patterns, recognize cognitive distortions, and develop more flexible ways of responding to distressing situations.
- Add Product to WishlistSale!
- Add Product to WishlistSale!
- Add Product to WishlistSale!
For more valuable resources, view our CBT Tools and Resources hub
The Challenge of Identifying Automatic Thoughts in Session
In my experience working with clients, one of the most common challenges is that people often recognize what happened and how they felt, but they may not immediately recognize the thoughts and interpretations contributing to that emotional response.
Clients may come to therapy saying, “I feel anxious,” “I always mess things up,” or “Nobody cares about me,” without realizing that these statements often reflect deeper assumptions or automatic thoughts that can be explored.
CBT Socratic questioning creates space to slow down these reactions and examine what is happening beneath the surface. By exploring the connection between thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and underlying beliefs, therapists can help clients develop greater self-awareness and identify opportunities for change.
Clinical Applications of CBT Socratic Questioning
Clinicians may use Socratic questioning across a variety of presenting concerns, including:
- Anxiety and excessive worry: Exploring catastrophic predictions, uncertainty, and perceived threats.
- Depression and negative self-beliefs: Examining hopeless thoughts, self-criticism, and rigid beliefs about the self.
- Trauma-related symptoms: Exploring beliefs related to safety, trust, responsibility, and self-blame when clinically appropriate.
- Obsessive-compulsive symptoms: Examining beliefs related to responsibility, certainty, and the meaning assigned to intrusive thoughts.
- Substance use concerns: Exploring thoughts and beliefs that contribute to urges, cravings, and decision-making.
- Eating-related challenges: Examining perfectionistic rules, self-evaluation, and beliefs related to control or body image.
- Low self-esteem and self-criticism: Identifying harsh self-judgments and developing more balanced self-appraisals.
Although Socratic questioning is strongly associated with CBT, similar principles of guided exploration are also incorporated into other therapeutic approaches, including Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT).
How Therapists Use Socratic Questioning in Practice
Effective Socratic questioning is not simply asking clients a list of questions. It is a collaborative process that helps clients investigate their own experiences and arrive at new insights through guided discovery.
Throughout this guide, we will explore how clinicians can use Socratic questioning in therapy sessions, examples of questions to ask clients, common mistakes to avoid, and strategies for helping clients develop greater cognitive flexibility.
Many clinicians use structured tools, such as a CBT Socratic Questioning Worksheet, to help clients slow down automatic thoughts, examine evidence, and develop more balanced perspectives during and between sessions. A worksheet can provide structure while still allowing the therapist to guide the conversation based on the client’s individual needs.
What Is Socratic Questioning in CBT?
Socratic questioning is a therapeutic technique that uses intentional, open-ended questions to help clients examine their thoughts, beliefs, and interpretations of situations. The goal is not for the therapist to persuade the client to adopt a different perspective. Instead, the therapist helps the client investigate their own thinking and arrive at conclusions through guided discovery.
In CBT, Socratic questioning is closely connected to cognitive restructuring, an intervention that helps clients identify and evaluate unhelpful thinking patterns. Aaron Beck, one of the founders of CBT, emphasized the importance of helping clients examine automatic thoughts rather than simply replacing them with therapist-provided interpretations (Beck et al., 1979).
Effective Socratic questioning encourages clients to become curious about their thoughts by exploring questions such as:
- What evidence supports this thought?
- What evidence may suggest another possibility?
- Is there another way to understand this situation?
- What assumptions are influencing this conclusion?
- How does this belief affect your emotions and behaviors?
The purpose of these questions is not to convince clients that their thoughts are “wrong.” Instead, clinicians help clients evaluate whether their interpretations are accurate, complete, helpful, and consistent with their goals.
Guided Discovery and Collaborative Empiricism in CBT
A key component of Socratic questioning is the CBT concept of guided discovery. Instead of acting as the expert who identifies distorted thinking and provides corrections, the therapist serves as a guide who helps clients investigate their experiences and develop their own insights (Padesky, 1993).
This approach reflects the CBT principle of collaborative empiricism. Therapist and client work together like investigators, examining thoughts, beliefs, and predictions by looking at evidence, patterns, and outcomes (Beck, 2021).
For example, consider a client who says:
“Everyone at work thinks I am incompetent.”
A therapist using direct correction might respond:
“I don’t think your coworkers believe that. You are probably being too hard on yourself.”
Although this response may be intended to reassure the client, it can unintentionally create a debate between the therapist’s perspective and the client’s experience.
A Socratic approach may instead involve questions such as:
- “What experiences have led you to believe your coworkers think this?”
- “What evidence supports this belief?”
- “Are there experiences that do not completely fit with this conclusion?”
- “How might someone who cares about you view this situation?”
Through this process, clients have the opportunity to examine their own beliefs rather than simply accepting a therapist’s alternative interpretation.
Clinical Note: Start With Understanding Before Challenging
In my experience, Socratic questioning works best when clients first feel understood. If a client feels dismissed or judged, even thoughtful questions can feel like an argument. Before exploring evidence or alternative perspectives, I often find it helpful to validate the emotional experience and acknowledge why a thought may have developed.
A client who says, “I always ruin everything,” may need compassion and curiosity before they are ready to examine the evidence behind that belief.
Types of Socratic Questions Therapists Can Use in CBT
Socratic questioning is not a single type of question. Skilled clinicians use different categories of questions depending on the client’s goals, emotional state, and stage of treatment. The purpose is not to follow a script or complete a checklist, but to support meaningful exploration and help clients develop insight through their own reasoning.
Below are several common categories of Socratic questions used in CBT and examples of how they may be applied in therapy sessions.
1. Clarifying Questions
Before helping clients evaluate a thought, therapists often need to understand exactly what the client means. Clarifying questions help slow down automatic reactions and encourage clients to describe their experience in greater detail.
| Clinical Purpose | Socratic Questions |
|---|---|
| Understand the client’s interpretation of an event |
|
These questions are especially useful early in treatment when clients may describe emotions or situations without recognizing the thoughts and meanings connected to those experiences.
2. Evidence-Based Questions
Evidence-based questions are among the most recognizable forms of Socratic questioning in CBT. These questions help clients examine whether their conclusions are fully supported by available information.
Cognitive restructuring often involves helping clients identify automatic thoughts, evaluate evidence, and develop more balanced interpretations rather than accepting initial thoughts as facts (Beck, 2021).
| Clinical Purpose | Socratic Questions |
|---|---|
| Evaluate the accuracy of a thought or belief |
|
Clinical Note: Evidence Does Not Mean Arguing With the Client
A common misunderstanding is that examining evidence means the therapist is trying to prove a client wrong. In practice, the goal is much more collaborative. I often remind clients that we are not trying to force a positive thought — we are simply looking at the full picture and making sure their conclusion accounts for all available information.
3. Alternative Perspective Questions
When clients experience distress, they may become focused on one interpretation of an event. Alternative perspective questions help clients consider whether other explanations or viewpoints may also be possible.
| Clinical Purpose | Socratic Questions |
|---|---|
| Increase cognitive flexibility |
|
The goal is not to replace a client’s perspective with a more positive interpretation. Instead, alternative perspective questions help clients recognize that situations may contain multiple possible explanations.
4. Questions That Explore Assumptions and Cognitive Distortions
Many distressing thoughts are influenced by underlying assumptions or cognitive distortions. Socratic questioning can help clients identify patterns such as catastrophizing, mind reading, overgeneralization, and personalization.
Rather than labeling a client’s thought as distorted, clinicians can help clients discover patterns through exploration.
| Clinical Purpose | Socratic Questions |
|---|---|
| Identify thinking patterns |
|
5. Questions That Examine Consequences and Impact
Some thoughts may not be completely accurate or inaccurate. Instead, they may be beliefs that influence emotions, behaviors, relationships, or long-term goals. Exploring the impact of a thought can help clients determine whether holding onto that belief is helpful.
| Clinical Purpose | Socratic Questions |
|---|---|
| Explore the effects of thoughts and beliefs |
|
6. Questions That Explore Core Beliefs
Some automatic thoughts connect to deeper beliefs about the self, others, or the world. Therapists may use Socratic questioning to explore these underlying beliefs when the client has appropriate emotional readiness and coping skills.
The downward arrow technique is one example of a CBT strategy that explores deeper meanings behind automatic thoughts by asking questions such as, “If this were true, what would it mean?” (Beck, 2021).
| Clinical Purpose | Socratic Questions |
|---|---|
| Explore deeper beliefs and meanings |
|
How Therapists Can Use Socratic Questioning in Therapy Sessions
Socratic questioning is most effective when integrated naturally into the therapeutic conversation. While worksheets and structured thought records can provide helpful guidance, the skill is not simply asking a series of questions. Effective Socratic questioning requires curiosity, empathy, timing, and awareness of the client’s readiness.
In my experience, the most helpful Socratic questions are often the ones that follow the client’s own words. When therapists move too quickly into a predetermined set of questions, clients may feel like they are completing an exercise rather than engaging in meaningful exploration.
A typical process may include:
- Identifying a specific situation that created emotional distress
- Exploring the automatic thought connected to that situation
- Examining evidence supporting and challenging the thought
- Considering alternative interpretations
- Developing a more balanced perspective
- Identifying how the client wants to respond moving forward
Example: Exploring an Anxiety-Related Thought
A client says:
“If I make a mistake during my presentation, everyone will think I am incompetent.”
A therapist may explore this thought with questions such as:
- “What makes this outcome feel likely?”
- “What evidence suggests people will judge you negatively?”
- “Have there been times when you made a mistake and the outcome was different than expected?”
- “What would you tell a coworker who had this same fear?”
- “What is a more balanced way to view this possibility?”
The goal is not to convince the client that nothing difficult will happen. Instead, the client learns to evaluate the situation more realistically and respond with greater flexibility.
Clinical Applications of Socratic Questioning in Therapy
Socratic questioning can be adapted for many clinical concerns because it focuses on helping clients examine the thoughts, interpretations, and beliefs that influence their emotional experiences and behaviors. While it is most commonly associated with CBT cognitive restructuring, clinicians may use Socratic questioning throughout treatment to increase awareness, explore patterns, and support behavioral change.
The following examples demonstrate how clinicians may apply Socratic questioning with different presenting concerns. These examples are not intended to suggest that cognitive exploration is appropriate in every situation. Clinical judgment, client readiness, emotional regulation, and treatment goals should always guide when and how this intervention is used.
Socratic Questioning for Anxiety
Clients experiencing anxiety often struggle with predictions about future events, uncertainty, and overestimating potential threats. Socratic questioning can help clients examine anxious predictions and consider whether their interpretation represents the most likely outcome or a feared possibility.
For example, a client may say:
“If I do not respond perfectly during this meeting, everyone will think I am incapable.”
A therapist may explore this belief by asking:
- “What makes this outcome feel likely?”
- “What evidence supports the belief that others will judge you this way?”
- “What evidence suggests another possibility?”
- “How have similar situations turned out in the past?”
- “What would you say to someone you care about who had this same fear?”
These questions can help clients separate predictions from facts and develop a more balanced understanding of uncertainty.
Clinical Note: Anxiety Often Feels Like Certainty
In my experience, many anxious clients are not simply worried about a possibility — they are experiencing that possibility as if it is already true. Socratic questioning can help create space between the thought and the outcome by exploring probability, evidence, and alternative explanations.
Socratic Questioning for Depression
Depression is often associated with negative beliefs about the self, the world, and the future. Clients may experience thoughts such as “I am a failure,” “Nothing will improve,” or “I cannot do anything right” as unquestionable facts rather than interpretations shaped by mood and past experiences.
CBT approaches often use cognitive restructuring to help clients identify and evaluate these patterns of thinking (Beck, 2021).
A therapist working with a client who says:
“I always fail at everything I try.”
may explore questions such as:
- “What experiences have contributed to this belief?”
- “Are there examples that do not completely fit with this conclusion?”
- “Is the word ‘always’ completely accurate?”
- “What strengths or efforts might you be overlooking?”
- “How would you view this situation if someone you cared about said this about themselves?”
Socratic Questioning for Trauma-Related Thoughts
Socratic questioning may also be incorporated into trauma-focused treatment when clinically appropriate. Following traumatic experiences, clients may develop beliefs related to safety, trust, responsibility, or self-worth that contribute to ongoing distress.
However, clinicians should approach trauma-related beliefs carefully. Exploring thoughts connected to trauma requires attention to pacing, emotional regulation, stabilization, and the client’s sense of safety.
Examples of questions may include:
- “What did you come to believe about yourself because of this experience?”
- “How has this belief affected your life since the event?”
- “Would you hold someone else responsible in the same way?”
- “Are there other factors that influenced what happened?”
- “What would you want someone you care about to understand about this experience?”
The purpose is not to minimize what happened or force a client toward forgiveness or acceptance. Instead, thoughtful exploration can help clients examine beliefs that may continue causing distress.
Socratic Questioning for OCD
For clients experiencing obsessive-compulsive symptoms, Socratic questioning may help explore beliefs related to responsibility, certainty, danger, and the meaning assigned to intrusive thoughts. However, clinicians should be mindful that excessive reassurance-seeking can sometimes reinforce obsessive-compulsive cycles.
Questions should support awareness and therapeutic goals rather than become another form of checking or reassurance.
Examples may include:
- “What meaning are you assigning to having this thought?”
- “What responsibility do you believe you have in this situation?”
- “How much certainty do you feel you need before moving forward?”
- “What happens when you try to eliminate all uncertainty?”
Socratic Questioning for Self-Esteem and Self-Criticism
Many clients struggle with harsh internal dialogue and deeply held beliefs about their worth or abilities. Socratic questioning can help clients examine whether self-critical beliefs are fair, accurate, and consistent with how they would treat others.
A client who says:
“I am not good enough.”
may benefit from questions such as:
- “What does ‘good enough’ mean to you?”
- “What standards are you using to evaluate yourself?”
- “Would you judge another person by the same standard?”
- “What evidence supports your strengths or abilities?”
- “Where do you think this belief originally came from?”
Common Mistakes Therapists Make When Using Socratic Questioning
Socratic questioning can be a powerful intervention, but the effectiveness depends greatly on how it is delivered. When used without sufficient empathy, timing, or collaboration, questions may feel invalidating or create resistance.
1. Turning Socratic Questions Into Disguised Advice
One common mistake is asking questions that already contain the therapist’s preferred answer.
For example:
“Don’t you think you are being too hard on yourself?”
Although phrased as a question, this communicates the therapist’s conclusion rather than inviting exploration.
A more collaborative approach may be:
“What standards are you using to judge yourself in this situation?”
2. Moving Into Cognitive Exploration Too Quickly
Clients often need emotional validation before they are ready to examine their thoughts. Immediately questioning a belief can unintentionally communicate that the emotion itself is the problem.
A therapist might first acknowledge:
“It makes sense that this feels painful given what you have experienced. Would it be okay if we explored this thought together?”
This approach maintains emotional safety while creating space for reflection.
3. Asking Too Many Questions Without Reflection
A rapid series of questions can make clients feel as though they are being interviewed rather than supported. Effective Socratic questioning includes reflection, silence, and curiosity.
Often, one thoughtful question followed by space for the client to respond is more effective than multiple questions delivered quickly.
4. Using Socratic Questioning as an Argument
The goal is not for the therapist to win a debate or prove that a client’s belief is irrational. Clients are more likely to develop lasting insight when they arrive at conclusions through their own exploration.
Research examining therapist use of Socratic questioning suggests that skillful use of this intervention is associated with cognitive change and symptom improvement in CBT for depression (Braun et al., 2015; Vittorio et al., 2022).
Socratic Questioning vs. Challenging Thoughts in CBT
Socratic questioning and challenging thoughts are sometimes used interchangeably, but they represent different therapeutic approaches. In CBT, the goal is not for the therapist to convince clients that their thoughts are incorrect. Instead, clinicians use guided discovery to help clients examine their own interpretations and evaluate whether those thoughts are accurate, helpful, or consistent with their goals.
This distinction is important because directly challenging a client’s belief can sometimes create defensiveness. A thought that appears unrealistic from the outside may feel completely logical when viewed through the client’s personal experiences, emotions, and history.
Aaron Beck emphasized that CBT is based on collaborative empiricism — the idea that therapists and clients work together to investigate thoughts and beliefs rather than relying on therapist authority alone (Beck, 2021).
For example, consider a client who says:
“Everyone at work thinks I am incompetent.”
A direct challenge might sound like:
“That is probably not true. Your coworkers likely do not think that about you.”
Although this response may be intended to reassure the client, it does not help the client examine how they reached that conclusion.
A Socratic approach may involve asking:
- “What experiences have contributed to this belief?”
- “What evidence supports this conclusion?”
- “What evidence might suggest another interpretation?”
- “Are there situations where this belief has not been true?”
- “What would be a more balanced way to describe this situation?”
Through this process, clients are encouraged to become active participants in evaluating their thoughts rather than passive recipients of therapist interpretations.
Clinical Note: Curiosity Creates More Change Than Correction
One of the most important shifts for clinicians learning Socratic questioning is moving away from trying to “fix” a client’s thought. In my experience, clients often make deeper changes when they feel invited to explore their thinking rather than persuaded to replace it.
The therapist’s role is not to find the “right answer” for the client. It is to create the conditions where clients can better understand themselves and make informed conclusions.
Benefits of Socratic Questioning in Therapy
When used effectively, Socratic questioning can support several important therapeutic processes. Rather than functioning as a standalone intervention, it is typically integrated into broader CBT treatment strategies such as cognitive restructuring, behavioral experiments, and skills development.
Encourages Self-Discovery and Insight
One of the primary benefits of Socratic questioning is that it allows clients to develop their own understanding of their thoughts and experiences. Insights developed through personal exploration may feel more meaningful and easier to apply outside of therapy.
Rather than telling a client, “You are catastrophizing,” a therapist can help the client identify the pattern by exploring questions such as:
- “What is the worst outcome you are imagining?”
- “How likely is that outcome based on past experiences?”
- “What other outcomes are possible?”
Improves Awareness of Automatic Thoughts
Many clients are aware of their emotions but have difficulty identifying the thoughts contributing to those emotions. Socratic questioning helps slow down the process and bring automatic thoughts into conscious awareness.
This awareness is often an important first step in cognitive restructuring because clients cannot evaluate thoughts they have not yet identified.
Supports Cognitive Flexibility
Cognitive flexibility involves the ability to consider multiple perspectives, tolerate uncertainty, and adjust interpretations based on new information. Socratic questioning encourages clients to move beyond rigid conclusions and consider alternative explanations.
Research examining cognitive change during CBT has highlighted the relationship between changes in thinking patterns and improvement in depressive symptoms, supporting the importance of cognitive processes within treatment (Vittorio et al., 2022).
Strengthens Collaboration in the Therapeutic Relationship
Socratic questioning reinforces the idea that therapy is a collaborative process. The therapist brings clinical knowledge and structure, while the client brings personal experience and insight.
This collaborative stance can help clients feel respected and empowered rather than analyzed or corrected.
Tips for Using Socratic Questioning Effectively
Socratic questioning is a skill that develops over time. The effectiveness of this intervention depends not only on the questions asked but also on the therapist’s tone, timing, and ability to create a safe environment for exploration.
1. Begin With Curiosity, Not Correction
Approach questions from a place of genuine curiosity. Clients are more likely to explore difficult thoughts when they feel that the therapist is trying to understand their perspective rather than change it.
2. Use the Client’s Own Language
The most effective questions often reflect the client’s exact words. Using clinical terminology or abstract concepts may create distance from the client’s actual experience.
For example, instead of:
“What cognitive distortion is occurring here?”
Consider:
“What makes this situation feel like proof that things will always go wrong?”
3. Balance Questions With Validation
Socratic questioning should complement empathy, not replace it. Clients often need their emotional experiences acknowledged before they are ready to evaluate their thoughts.
4. Allow Silence
Silence is an important part of guided discovery. Clients need time to process questions, notice reactions, and develop their own responses.
5. Avoid Using a Scripted Checklist
Worksheets and question lists can be helpful tools, but Socratic questioning is most effective when it follows the client’s experience. A rigid approach can make therapy feel mechanical rather than collaborative.
6. Consider Readiness and Emotional Regulation
Not every client or every moment is appropriate for cognitive exploration. Clients experiencing intense emotional distress, crisis, or significant dysregulation may benefit first from stabilization, grounding, and emotional support.
Frequently Asked Questions About Socratic Questioning
What is Socratic questioning in CBT?
Socratic questioning is a CBT technique that uses open-ended questions to help clients examine thoughts, beliefs, assumptions, and interpretations. The therapist guides the client through exploration rather than providing direct answers or corrections.
What are examples of Socratic questions therapists can ask?
Examples include:
- “What evidence supports this thought?”
- “What evidence suggests another possibility?”
- “What else could this situation mean?”
- “What would you tell a friend experiencing this?”
- “How does this belief affect your actions?”
Is Socratic questioning only used in CBT?
No. Although Socratic questioning is strongly associated with CBT, similar principles of guided exploration are also used in approaches such as Motivational Interviewing, REBT, and other collaborative therapies.
Can Socratic questioning make clients feel challenged or judged?
Yes, if used without sufficient empathy, validation, or collaboration. Questions that feel like they contain a hidden answer can create resistance. Effective Socratic questioning requires curiosity, respect, and attention to the therapeutic relationship.
How is Socratic questioning different from reassurance?
Reassurance provides an answer or attempts to reduce distress by telling clients that something is not true or will be okay. Socratic questioning helps clients examine their own thoughts and develop their own conclusions through guided exploration.
Closing Thoughts About Socratic Questioning
Socratic questioning is more than simply asking clients a series of questions. When used effectively, it is a collaborative therapeutic process that helps clients slow down, examine their experiences, and develop a deeper understanding of their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.
For many clients, automatic thoughts feel like facts. They may experience predictions, assumptions, or self-critical beliefs as objective truths rather than interpretations influenced by past experiences, emotions, and current circumstances. Socratic questioning creates an opportunity to explore those beliefs with curiosity and compassion.
The most effective clinicians recognize that Socratic questioning is not about proving a client wrong. It is about creating a space where clients can investigate their own experiences, identify patterns, consider alternative perspectives, and make meaningful changes that align with their goals.
In my practice, I have found that the quality of the question often matters more than the number of questions asked. A thoughtful question asked at the right moment can help a client notice something they have never considered before. However, this process requires patience, empathy, and a strong therapeutic relationship.
Like any therapeutic intervention, Socratic questioning should be guided by clinical judgment, training, and the individual needs of each client. Some clients benefit from structured cognitive exploration, while others may first need validation, emotional regulation skills, or trauma-informed support before examining difficult beliefs.
When integrated thoughtfully into CBT and other collaborative approaches, Socratic questioning can help clients develop greater self-awareness, cognitive flexibility, and confidence in their ability to evaluate their own experiences.
TherapyByPro is a trusted resource for mental health professionals worldwide. Our therapy tools are designed with one mission in mind: to save you time and help you focus on what truly matters-your clients. Every worksheet, counseling script, and therapy poster in our shop is professionally crafted to simplify your workflow, enhance your sessions, reduce stress, and most of all, help your clients.
Want to reach more clients? We can help! TherapyByPro is also a therapist directory designed to help you reach new clients, highlight your expertise, and make a meaningful impact in the lives of others.
- Add Product to WishlistSale!
- Add Product to WishlistSale!
- Add Product to WishlistSale!
References
- Beck, J. S. (2021). Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive Therapy of Depression. Guilford Press.
- Braun, J. D., Strunk, D. R., Sasso, K. E., & Cooper, A. A. (2015). Therapist use of Socratic questioning predicts session-to-session symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 70, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.004
- Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2010). Cognitive Therapy of Anxiety Disorders: Science and Practice. Guilford Press.
- Overholser, J. C. (2011). Collaborative empiricism: A pragmatic approach to cognitive therapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 41(2), 109–117.
- Padesky, C. A. (1993). Socratic questioning: Changing minds or guiding discovery? Keynote address presented at the European Congress of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies.
- Vittorio, L. N., Murphy, S. T., Braun, J. D., & Strunk, D. R. (2022). Using Socratic questioning to promote cognitive change and achieve depressive symptom reduction: Evidence of cognitive change as a mediator. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 150, 104035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2022.104035